Manufacturing Financial Reality: Profit on Paper, Cash and Cost in Motion
A manufacturer can have a good month and still wonder where the cash went.
The orders were there. Production stayed busy. Sales were strong. The income statement shows a profit. Yet the checking account does not seem to agree with any of it.
There may be nothing unusual happening. The problem can simply be that manufacturing moves money through a business in ways that an income statement does not immediately show.
That makes manufacturing bookkeeping different from the bookkeeping of a business that buys something today and sells essentially the same thing tomorrow. A manufacturer buys materials, adds labor, uses equipment, carries inventory and produces something that did not exist before. Cash begins moving through that process well before the customer pays for the finished product.
If the books do not follow that movement reasonably well, the financial statements become much less useful to the person running the company.
Where did the cash go?
Suppose you buy $40,000 of raw materials.
You have $40,000 less cash. That part is obvious.
What happened to the other side of the transaction is less obvious because you may still own the material. It is sitting in inventory waiting to be used. Some of it may enter production next week. Some may remain on the shelf for two months.
Eventually part of that material moves into production. Employees work on it. Equipment is used. Other production costs accumulate. You now have money tied up in something that is partly finished.
When the product is completed, you still may not have recovered the cash. The finished product could sit in inventory waiting for a customer. Once it sells, the customer might have 30 or 60 days to pay the invoice.
Think about the timing.
The company paid for material. It paid employees. It paid rent, utilities and other operating expenses. It may have made an equipment payment. It completed the product and shipped it.
The customer still has not paid.
The sale can be profitable while the cash needed to produce it has been gone for weeks.
This is one reason a growing manufacturer can feel increasingly short of cash even when sales and profits are improving.
More orders often require more material and more production before they produce more cash.
Inventory is one of the places cash goes
Inventory can become a large number on a manufacturer's balance sheet, but it started as cash.
That is worth remembering when looking at the company's bank balance.
A warehouse full of raw material may be necessary for production. It may also represent a substantial amount of money that cannot currently be used to make payroll, pay a supplier or repair a machine.
Finished goods have the same problem. They have absorbed material and production costs but have not yet generated cash.
This is why a manufacturer can have substantial assets and still experience cash pressure.
It is also why inaccurate inventory records cause problems beyond the inventory account itself.
If the books say the company has $200,000 of inventory and the actual amount is $150,000, there is a $50,000 problem somewhere. The effect may eventually appear in cost of goods sold, gross profit and taxable income. Management may also be making decisions based on inventory that does not exist.
A physical inventory count is therefore connected to much more than knowing how many units are on a shelf.
Purchasing and product cost are different questions
One of the easiest mistakes in looking at manufacturing finances is to assume that what the company purchased during the month is what the company used during the month.
It may not be.
Suppose you purchased $25,000 of material in September. Some of it was used immediately. Some remains in inventory on September 30. Some of the material used in September may actually have been purchased in August.
The September purchasing number cannot, by itself, tell you what September production cost.
This becomes especially important when material prices are changing.
The owner may see purchasing expense increasing and conclude that products have become more expensive to manufacture. That may be true. It could also reflect a decision to buy additional inventory, a large purchase made ahead of a price increase, or simply the timing of supplier invoices.
The bookkeeping has to preserve enough information to tell those situations apart.
Otherwise, the numbers are accurate in the narrow sense that every transaction was entered, while still giving management a poor picture of what happened.
Labor has its own timing and classification problems
Payroll is usually easy to identify. Every week or two, money leaves the bank.
What the payroll produced is harder to see.
Some employees work directly in production. Other employees may supervise production, receive materials, maintain equipment, ship finished products or perform administrative work.
Depending on the business and the information management needs, those costs may need to be understood differently.
There is also a practical question behind the accounting treatment.
If labor costs increase 12 percent while production increases 4 percent, what happened?
Maybe overtime increased. Perhaps a production problem required rework. Maybe the company added employees in anticipation of growth. The mix of products could have changed. Production volume might simply have been lower during the period.
The general ledger will not automatically explain any of this.
It can, however, be structured so that the owner has enough reliable information to investigate the question.
That is a much more useful standard for bookkeeping than simply asking whether payroll reconciled to the bank.
Equipment can make profit and cash look even farther apart
Manufacturing equipment adds another layer.
A large machine may require a substantial cash payment when purchased. The accounting expense associated with that machine can occur over several years through depreciation.
If the equipment is financed, principal and interest affect the financial statements differently even though both are part of the payment leaving the bank.
Then there are repairs.
A machine that becomes increasingly expensive to maintain can slowly change the economics of a production process. The effect may be spread across dozens of transactions during the year and never attract much attention when each invoice is entered.
Looking at the transactions individually tells you what was paid.
Looking at them as part of the operation may tell you that a piece of equipment has become expensive to keep.
Those are different uses of the same bookkeeping data.
Growth can create a cash problem
This is the part that can seem backwards.
A manufacturer gets a large new customer. Sales increase. The additional business is profitable.
That sounds like an immediate financial improvement.
Now follow the cash.
The manufacturer may have to order more material. Suppliers need to be paid according to their terms. Additional production may mean overtime or additional employees. Freight costs increase. The company ships the product and invoices the customer.
If the customer pays in 45 days, the manufacturer has financed much of that growth during those 45 days.
Get several new customers at once and the amount of cash tied up in that cycle can become substantial.
A company can therefore grow itself into a cash shortage.
The problem may become more serious when the owner looks at a profitable income statement and assumes that the same amount of money should be available in the bank.
It will not be if the money is sitting in inventory and accounts receivable or has been used for equipment, debt principal and other balance-sheet activity.
This is why the books have to follow the operation
A bank reconciliation tells us whether the accounting records agree with the bank. That is an essential control.
For a manufacturer, it is only part of the job.
The owner also needs reasonable confidence that inventory is represented correctly, purchases are classified consistently, payroll is recorded appropriately, equipment transactions are handled correctly, receivables are real and collectible, and the financial statements reflect the way the company actually operates.
The degree of detail will vary by company.
A small manufacturer does not need an accounting structure designed for General Motors. Building a complicated cost accounting system that nobody maintains or understands does not improve the books.
The system needs to fit the business.
If the owner needs to know profitability by product line, the accounting process needs to support that question. If purchasing is the major concern, the records need enough structure to understand purchasing and inventory movement. If cash is continually tight despite reported profits, the first task may be tracing where cash is being absorbed.
That is where useful financial analysis begins: with a specific question about the business and accounting records capable of answering it.
What should a manufacturer expect from its bookkeeping?
At a minimum, the books should allow the owner to make sense of the relationship between the operation and the financial statements.
If sales increased, what happened to gross profit?
If gross profit improved, why did cash decline?
How much cash is sitting in inventory?
How much is sitting in accounts receivable?
Are material costs changing?
Are payroll costs moving with production?
What is happening to equipment and maintenance costs?
Those questions do not require a 40-page management report every month. They require reliable underlying records and financial statements that arrive soon enough to be useful.
That last point matters.
A perfectly prepared financial statement delivered three months after the fact may satisfy a reporting requirement. It is considerably less useful for deciding what to do next Tuesday.
The purpose of the books
Manufacturing creates accounting complexity because money changes form as it moves through the company.
Cash becomes raw material. Raw material enters production. Labor and other costs are added. Finished products become inventory. A sale creates a receivable. Eventually, the receivable becomes cash again.
The accounting records should allow you to follow that movement.
When they do, an owner can begin to understand why a profitable month produced less cash, whether inventory is growing too quickly, where production costs are changing and whether growth is creating financial pressure.
When they do not, the owner is left trying to run the business from a bank balance and an income statement that may only show part of what is happening.
For a manufacturing company, good bookkeeping should make the movement of the business visible in the numbers.
If your manufacturing company is busy and profitable but the financial statements still leave you wondering where the money went, schedule a consult with KT Bookkeeping and Accounting.
Comments